The Floating Soap Bubble

background bubbles with text: The Floating Bubble / Density of gas

The floating soap bubble1 is an experiment that is very easy to set up and carry out (Video 1).

Video 1: Floating Bubbles? Tommy Technetium YouTube channel, accessed 8/19/23.

 

Isn’t that a beautiful effect? My students certainly find this effect to be rather captivating. This experiment is also quite popular with younger students, so it tends to be a real hit at outreach events.

I present the floating soap bubble experiment to my students in class at the beginning of the year when discussing the topic of density. However, because this experiment can be used in a wide variety of ways, I often revisit the experiment throughout the year.

Here’s the way I usually carry out the experiment in class. I first liberally sprinkle baking soda into the bottom of the very large container with transparent sides (like an aquarium). I add at least two cups of baking soda. Next, I pour at least one quart of vinegar into the large container, on top of the baking soda. The following chemical reaction occurs, generating a lot of CO2 gas:

NaHCO3 (s) + CH3COOH(aq) → CH3COONa(aq) + H2O + CO2(g)            Equation 1

I make sure not to disturb the container as the CO2 is produced. Once the reaction settles down, I carefully blow bubbles straight across the top of the container (Figure 1), perhaps a foot above the container. I make sure not to blow down into the container, which would displace the CO2 gas.

Figure 1: Blowing bubbles into an aquarium full of CO2 gas.

 

One or more of the bubbles settles into the container, but floats on top of the CO2 gas that has formed (Figure 2). 

Figure 2: The floating soap bubble!

 

It is interesting to continue to observe the bubbles that continue to float. Students will notice that over time, the bubbles slowly sink and concurrently increase in size. After students make these observations, I use my hands to “scoop” out the CO2 gas in the container. After this, I try to get a bubble to float in the container after the CO2 gas has been scooped out. This of course fails if enough CO2 has been removed from the container.

Explanation 

As stated previously, when the baking soda and vinegar are mixed, carbon dioxide gas is formed (Equation 1). Carbon dioxide has a density of 1.8 g / L, while air has a density of 1.2 g / L. Because carbon dioxide is more dense than air, it sinks in air. Therefore, the carbon dioxide formed in this reaction stays “sunk” in the container. If I’m using this experiment when discussing gas laws and the density of gases, I make certain to note that the density of CO2 is 1.5 times that of the density of air, which is equal to the ratio of the molar masses of CO2 (44 g mol-1) and air (average 29 g mol-1).  

A bubble blown into the tank floats. Note that the gas inside the bubble is mostly air. The density of the soap bubble, which contains mostly air, is lower than that of CO2, allowing it to float on the CO2 in the container. Because many students think the gas we exhale is comprised entirely of CO2, I think it’s important to tell students that only 4-5% of the gas we exhale is CO2.2  

Over time, the bubbles blown into the container slowly sink. By observing this process carefully, it can be seen that the bubbles grow in volume as they sink. These processes occur as CO2 diffuses into the bubbles, causing their density (and size) to increase.

The floating soap bubble indeed relates to several chemical topics: density, gas-releasing chemical reactions, gas diffusion, and the relationship between molar mass and density of gases. If you end up using this experiment in your classroom, be sure to let me know how it worked out for you, and if you learn anything interesting when you do.

Happy Experimenting!

Note added after publication:

My good friend, Jerry Bell, contacted me just a few weeks after this post was initially published. He mentioned to me that I missed some interesting features of the diffusion of the CO2 across the bubble membrane. He was gracious enough to write up the explanation outlined below. Very cool stuff, indeed! 

As the soap bubbles sink into the bath of carbon dioxide gas, they increase in size. These observations mean that carbon dioxide is entering the bubble, thus increasing its density (higher molecular mass gas) and its size. But simple diffusion cannot explain how this happens. Simple diffusion of  carbon dioxide into the bubble would be more than compensated by simple diffusion of the lighter air molecules out of the bubble. So it should shrink, not grow, if this were the mechanism. What is going on is much more interesting, facilitated diffusion. The aqueous soap bubble film solution is basic and carbon dioxide reacts rapidly with it, CO2(g) + OH(aq)  → HOCO2(aq). The reverse reaction occurs at the inner surface where the carbon dioxide concentration inside the bubble is low. This creates a gradient of bicarbonate ion across the film that moves the bicarbonate across quickly. No such mechanism is available to the air, so its diffusion is too slow to be relevant, but this phenomenon adds further chemical relevance and content to this floating (and sinking) soap bubble demonstration.

References:

1. Shakhashiri, B.Z. Chemical Demonstrations: A Handbook for Teachers of Chemistry, vol. 2, 1985, The University of Wisconsin Press.

2. Siobal, M. S. Respiratory Care 2016, 61 (10), 1397-1416.

NGSS

Constructing explanations and designing solutions in 9–12 builds on K–8 experiences and progresses to explanations and designs that are supported by multiple and independent student-generated sources of evidence consistent with scientific ideas, principles, and theories.

Summary:

Constructing explanations and designing solutions in 9–12 builds on K–8 experiences and progresses to explanations and designs that are supported by multiple and independent student-generated sources of evidence consistent with scientific ideas, principles, and theories. Construct and revise an explanation based on valid and reliable evidence obtained from a variety of sources (including students’ own investigations, models, theories, simulations, peer review) and the assumption that theories and laws that describe the natural world operate today as they did in the past and will continue to do so in the future.

Assessment Boundary:
Clarification:

Planning and carrying out investigations in 9-12 builds on K-8 experiences and progresses to include investigations that provide evidence for and test conceptual, mathematical, physical, and empirical models.

Summary:

Planning and carrying out investigations in 9-12 builds on K-8 experiences and progresses to include investigations that provide evidence for and test conceptual, mathematical, physical, and empirical models. Plan and conduct an investigation individually and collaboratively to produce data to serve as the basis for evidence, and in the design: decide on types, how much, and accuracy of data needed to produce reliable measurements and consider limitations on the precision of the data (e.g., number of trials, cost, risk, time), and refine the design accordingly.

Assessment Boundary:
Clarification:

Students who demonstrate understanding can construct and revise an explanation for the outcome of a simple chemical reaction based on the outermost electron states of atoms, trends in the periodic table, and knowledge of the patterns of chemical properties.

*More information about all DCI for HS-PS1 can be found at https://www.nextgenscience.org/dci-arrangement/hs-ps1-matter-and-its-interactions and further resources at https://www.nextgenscience.org.

Summary:

Students who demonstrate understanding can construct and revise an explanation for the outcome of a simple chemical reaction based on the outermost electron states of atoms, trends in the periodic table, and knowledge of the patterns of chemical properties.

Assessment Boundary:

Assessment is limited to chemical reactions involving main group elements and combustion reactions.

Clarification:

Examples of chemical reactions could include the reaction of sodium and chlorine, of carbon and oxygen, or of carbon and hydrogen.

Join the conversation.

All comments must abide by the ChemEd X Comment Policy, are subject to review, and may be edited. Please allow one business day for your comment to be posted, if it is accepted.

Comments 2

Jarral Ryter | Fri, 09/08/2023 - 14:01

An option to baffle or test comprehension would be to make bubbles with dry ice (lots of plans out there) or if you happen to have carbon dioxide cylinder. These will drop very fast compared to a normal bubble. I never tried to put them into a tank full of CO2 but they should go to the bottom.