Homogeneous Solutions using PhET Interactive Simulations and labs

preview image of solutions pHet simulation

This is a series of experiments, PhET Interactive Simulation activities, and clicker questions to relate macroscopic and molecular representations of homogenenous solutions. Graphing skills are also used.

Concepts: 
covalent bonding
ionic bonding
molarity
solutions
Concepts: 

PhET Activity 1

Learning Goals: Students will be able to:

  • Identify if a compound is a salt or sugar by macroscopic observations or microscopic representations.
  • Explain how using combinations of solutes changes solution characteristics or not.
  • Use observations to explain ways concentration of a solute can change.
  • Describe ways the formula, macroscopic observations, or microscopic representations of a compound indicates if the bonding is ionic or covalent.

Lab 1: Determine the solubility of table salt and table sugar in room temperature water using varying amounts of water.

PhET Activity 2:

Learning Goals: Students will be able to

  • Determine the solubility for some solutes and explain why the solubility cannot be determined for others given experimental constraints.
  • Identify the relationships for measurable variables by designing quantitative experiments, collecting data, graphing, and using appropriate trend lines.

Lab 2: 

  • Determine the amount of grams of solute to make a given volume of specified molarity.
  • After dilution, determine the molarity of a solution.
Procedure time: 
> 90 minutes
Time required: 

This is a combination of activities that will take several class periods or a few class periods and homework if students have computer access outside of classtime. 

Materials: 

Access to PhET Inteactive Simulations -

Activity 1 Sugar and Salts 

Activity 2 Molarity 

Lab 1: Sugar, Salt, water, Graduated cylinders, Excel or graphing program or graph paper

Lab 2: I chose the nickel salt because I had a large supply and it has a nice color. I did not

worry that it might not totally dissolve, but just wanted to make sure it was colored and that

dilution would look very different. You could use any number of chemicals and perhaps one that

is more soluble. My jar was full and had not been used in 15 years, so it seemed a good use. 

Background: 

This series of exercises is meant to introduce solutions to students with little background. For more advanced students, parts could be skipped.

Procedure: 

See the attached pdf. 

Questions: 

See the Teacher pdf or http://phet.colorado.edu/en/contributions/view/3745 to get the Powerpoint versions. 

Preparation: 

Both labs require little preparation if you have standard chemical lab equipment. The PhET activities require the use of computers with Java installed. The simulations can be run online or downloaded onto the comuters in advance of the class.

Attribution: 

PhET Interactive Simulations and the activities written by a PhET team member (which I am) are licensed under Creative Commons and may be used or adapted. 

Collection: 

NGSS

Students who demonstrate understanding can plan and conduct an investigation to gather evidence to compare the structure of substances at the bulk scale to infer the strength of electrical forces between particles.

*More information about all DCI for HS-PS1 can be found at https://www.nextgenscience.org/dci-arrangement/hs-ps1-matter-and-its-interactions and further resources at https://www.nextgenscience.org.

Summary:

Students who demonstrate understanding can plan and conduct an investigation to gather evidence to compare the structure of substances at the bulk scale to infer the strength of electrical forces between particles. 

Assessment Boundary:

Assessment does not include Raoult’s law calculations of vapor pressure.

Clarification:

Emphasis is on understanding the strengths of forces between particles, not on naming specific intermolecular forces (such as dipole-dipole). Examples of particles could include ions, atoms, molecules, and networked materials (such as graphite). Examples of bulk properties of substances could include the melting point and boiling point, vapor pressure, and surface tension.

Students who demonstrate understanding can use mathematical representations to support the claim that atoms, and therefore mass, are conserved during a chemical reaction.

*More information about all DCI for HS-PS1 can be found at https://www.nextgenscience.org/dci-arrangement/hs-ps1-matter-and-its-interactions and further resources at https://www.nextgenscience.org.

Summary:

Students who demonstrate understanding can use mathematical representations to support the claim that atoms, and therefore mass, are conserved during a chemical reaction.

Assessment Boundary:

Assessment does not include complex chemical reactions.

Clarification:

Emphasis is on using mathematical ideas to communicate the proportional relationships between masses of atoms in the reactants and the products, and the translation of these relationships to the macroscopic scale using the mole as the conversion from the atomic to the macroscopic scale. Emphasis is on assessing students’ use of mathematical thinking and not on memorization and rote application of problem - solving techniques.