Tweets

Luann ChristensenLee @stardiverr I’ve tried discussing possible factors before and after but before they write. Some parrot it back. 5 years 5 months ago Reply Retweet Favorite
Kevin McChesney @TigerPhysics and it is all Ss lead I hardly have to say anything. 5 years 6 months ago Reply Retweet Favorite
Kevin McChesney @TigerPhysics I let them make a cheat sheet for the test that they can use. The discussions going on in class are awesome 5 years 6 months ago Reply Retweet Favorite
Lowell Thomson @ThomsonScience Thanks for this clarification. I hadn't considered the benefit of ind. first. Hmmmm. 5 years 6 months ago Reply Retweet Favorite
Lowell Thomson @ThomsonScience Thanks. And my thought is this process did BOTH! I saw it as a win-win. Let me know how it turns out if you try it. 5 years 6 months ago Reply Retweet Favorite
Lowell Thomson @ThomsonScience Cool. Thanks for sharing that link. I'll look more in-depth this weekend. Busy marking labs tonight. 5 years 6 months ago Reply Retweet Favorite
Lowell Thomson @ThomsonScience Another cool idea. I didn't get that sophisticated. My first attempt, so I went easy. I like the idea. 5 years 6 months ago Reply Retweet Favorite
Lowell Thomson @ThomsonScience Oooh, I like that! I may have to try something similar. Do you let Ss keep notes and use them? Just curious. 5 years 6 months ago Reply Retweet Favorite
Kevin McChesney @TigerPhysics I have done summarize what your group knows about a model b4 a test. I call it a group test but it's a review 5 years 6 months ago Reply Retweet Favorite
Lowell Thomson @ThomsonScience (2/2) so variety wasn't as prevalent. BHC tends to give great trouble, so I wanted it mostly for learning opp. 5 years 6 months ago Reply Retweet Favorite
Lowell Thomson @ThomsonScience It was similar, but not identical. This was intended to be a very specific topic (Born-Haber cycle) (1/2) 5 years 6 months ago Reply Retweet Favorite
Lowell Thomson @ThomsonScience Very cool. I look forward to hearing about your results as well. 5 years 6 months ago Reply Retweet Favorite
Lowell Thomson @ThomsonScience And the "Quiz" aspect (all 7 points!) made it higher stakes. Students were hyper-focused. It was great. 5 years 6 months ago Reply Retweet Favorite
Lowell Thomson @ThomsonScience I say go for it. Having taught geometry before, discussion can really solidify Ss understanding. 5 years 6 months ago Reply Retweet Favorite
Lowell Thomson @ThomsonScience Student feedback was overwhelmingly positive. I think I'll be coining a blog post this weekend. Marking labs today 5 years 6 months ago Reply Retweet Favorite
Lowell Thomson @ThomsonScience I definitely counted both! I liked group quiz first, as it was a learning opportunity, in my mind. 5 years 6 months ago Reply Retweet Favorite
Lowell Thomson @ThomsonScience Group quiz contained one multi-step question on Born-Haber cycle. Turned in. Ind. quiz contained new question. 5 years 6 months ago Reply Retweet Favorite
Lowell Thomson @ThomsonScience Good question. What about a 'non-assessed' group quiz, followed by your 'real' individual quiz? The discussion was key. 5 years 6 months ago Reply Retweet Favorite
Lowell Thomson @ThomsonScience I gave a group quiz followed by individual quiz today. It was an amazing way for my kids to learn from a quiz. I loved it. 5 years 6 months ago Reply Retweet Favorite
Lowell Thomson @ThomsonScience Definitely agree with models/reinforces enthalpy concepts. I've found it more helpful the better I teach it, too. 5 years 6 months ago Reply Retweet Favorite